Outstanding article. Thanks a million for spending the time to research these very important topics. I was born with an anti-hysteria and anti-panic meter. Knew within a week of mid March 2020 that this whole thing was designed to take down Trump and to finally get the Sheeple in order. What was really surprising was how many people fell for this, became so panic stricken about a virus that is about as deadly as the seasonal flu, and that this whole science experiment would pit half the country against each other on topics like the efficacy of masking and of course the ‘novel’ “vaccines”.
And yes, the amount of time I’ve spent researching 1918... a lot of time... In fact, I’ve since uncovered even more information that further confirms everything I state here. But still the origins of the Spanish Flu remains elusive; but I think I know have a good idea what it might be...
Thank you, Todd. I totally agree with what you say. I mistakenly believed that my fellow Americans (both right and left) would quickly see through the BS and join together and rise up and put an end to the scam. But alas, as we all know, it never happened, in large part because the MSM closed ranks to promote Fauci’s Covid scam. And as you know, most people just don’t want to do their own research; they’re happy to outsource their thinking to the MSM.
i had read somewhere that they were vaccinating the army against the spanish flu. i have been meaning to look into this claim; is there any evidence about vaccines being used? excellent article. very informative and well-researched.
Thank you for the comment. Yes, I have explored and continue to explore the role of the experimental U.S. Army vaccine in igniting the 1918 influenza. I have nothing conclusive. But I am keeping an open mind. If you look on my page, from a few months ago, you will find my article about this matter.
Also see the second link below. Having researched for the article linked above, I did not research, and was confused by, the "fact" that it lasted a long time. A respiratory illness travels quickly and burns itself out through creating herd immunity in any one place. Three months is about the limit, after which it will only be endemic.
thanks, Keith. In another article I explored whether or not German bio warfare might be the culprit. But yes, we certainly need to take a closer look at those Fort Riley experiments. Thanks for pointing me in that direction.
Let me know wehen you've read my article. The 1918 narrative is one of the things used to put people in fear, while at the same time protecting the idea that vaccines are always beneficial. The article is over two years old, and I've already had run-ins with two "Truther" organisations who put out pieces that support the Spanish Influenza story; not through supporting it specifically, but by referring to 1918 without addressing the lie. I had had doubts about both of them being Controlled Opposition, and their refusal to accept the Fort Riley origin confirmed my suspicion.
As I said, please let me have your thoughts when you've read the article and attached references. I'm very open to debate, but sadly only know I've won them normally when the other side resorts to insults or "disappears." Truth loves debate, lies detest it.
Very very interesting and I have questions. 👇🏻BINGO. 100%
“ Either way, the narrative here needs to go mainstream. 1918 was a mega pandemic; it is also a mega lie. And dismantling that first big lie is a good start to dismantling the framework of Covid lies that now permeates politics and media.”
I think that one possible motive for Fauci's (genocidal) fixation with mRNA vaccines is mentioned here in this article: that the influenza virus didn't kill, it only weakened the immune system. So to does HIV (another virus, btw, along with the common cold viruses and the herpes viruses that sicken people.)
Fauci's running a grand network of Pharma and Bio biz. A kingpin. There's a few other kingpins, no Emperor-pin yet.
But I think that Fauci saw in programmable mRNA, whether viral or by vaccine, the ability to ad-hoc debase immune systems worldwide, and then to sell sell sell more Pharma, more Bio.
In his 8 March 2020 60 Minute interview he was reinforceing his advice not to wears masks from his knowledge of the 1918 flu, the bacteriallly infected pleural fluids . Yes, in the paper from 2008 "Predominant Role of Bacterial Pneumonia as a Cause of Death in Pandemic Influenza: Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness" the authors, he being the last author listed of three (not so numerous!), masks are not mentioned. But in the interview the term he used was "schmutz". That's oral-nasal fluids, which can include pleural fluids, brought up from coughing and that term "pleural fluids" is used in the paper. It's remarkably strange advice at the time. Masks were indeed then a good protocol to follow.
Instead he emphasized hand washing.
If however Fauci THEN thought that secondary bacterial infections where killing the most sickened from the Covid virus, then the masks are meaningless, as they don't stop the internal bacteria already in people.
And he wanted the general weakening of immune systems, in everyone on Earth. So getting the virus is okay. It's pure marketing 101. Compel a market into buying your products.
Fauci's interview broadcast that night of 8 March 2020, was in that few weeks the cohort of international "artists" and entrepreneurs and bureaucrats was skull-duggerying with burner phones and cryptic emails and such on how to cover the tune coming out of the Peking Opera touring in Wuhan. That last week of February, first week of March, a high stress time for him and them. So his interview is interesting to me.
I did - that was the reason for the comment. BUT,... I tried again today and it's online again - it may have been a routing black hole (sometimes happens with the routing protocols the Internet uses) or local server problem . Sorry to have troubled you.
Tremendous resource - I'm extremely grateful that you've provided the pointer to it.
I've also retained the link to your newsletter.
Confusing times need people with insight and a good memory.
You mean the ‘Russian flu’ of 1889-90, yes? There have been a few articles about this. Even more interesting, in an article from the early 1990s, I found reference to the impact of solar radiation on instigating mutations and outbreaks. But I emphasize that the article only mentions this in passing and doesn’t offer much detail. I plan to follow this up
A flu of 1889-90 is what I mean. I've not dug deep enough to determine a geographic reference yet - just noted the date and the lack of a mention elsewhere.
I have a source which I can query for scientific articles and books back to 1800 - it's not perfect and the encyclopedia you pointed to fills a lot of gaps.
I'm still digging and I'm a novice at this - my background is in telecoms, hardware/software, computers and IT in many years past.
Outstanding article. Thanks a million for spending the time to research these very important topics. I was born with an anti-hysteria and anti-panic meter. Knew within a week of mid March 2020 that this whole thing was designed to take down Trump and to finally get the Sheeple in order. What was really surprising was how many people fell for this, became so panic stricken about a virus that is about as deadly as the seasonal flu, and that this whole science experiment would pit half the country against each other on topics like the efficacy of masking and of course the ‘novel’ “vaccines”.
And yes, the amount of time I’ve spent researching 1918... a lot of time... In fact, I’ve since uncovered even more information that further confirms everything I state here. But still the origins of the Spanish Flu remains elusive; but I think I know have a good idea what it might be...
Thank you, Todd. I totally agree with what you say. I mistakenly believed that my fellow Americans (both right and left) would quickly see through the BS and join together and rise up and put an end to the scam. But alas, as we all know, it never happened, in large part because the MSM closed ranks to promote Fauci’s Covid scam. And as you know, most people just don’t want to do their own research; they’re happy to outsource their thinking to the MSM.
i had read somewhere that they were vaccinating the army against the spanish flu. i have been meaning to look into this claim; is there any evidence about vaccines being used? excellent article. very informative and well-researched.
Thank you for the comment. Yes, I have explored and continue to explore the role of the experimental U.S. Army vaccine in igniting the 1918 influenza. I have nothing conclusive. But I am keeping an open mind. If you look on my page, from a few months ago, you will find my article about this matter.
This article is very good in that it corrects lies about how many died, and how long the epidemic lasted. However, it misses the truth that the epidemic was started by the Fort Riley vaccinations. It was never Spanish, and was not flu. See https://unlockthelockdown.com/the-1918-pandemic-was-caused-by-a-vaccine-absolute-bombshell/
Also see the second link below. Having researched for the article linked above, I did not research, and was confused by, the "fact" that it lasted a long time. A respiratory illness travels quickly and burns itself out through creating herd immunity in any one place. Three months is about the limit, after which it will only be endemic.
https://unlockthelockdown.com/epidemiology-for-dummies-what-you-ought-to-know/
thanks, Keith. In another article I explored whether or not German bio warfare might be the culprit. But yes, we certainly need to take a closer look at those Fort Riley experiments. Thanks for pointing me in that direction.
Let me know wehen you've read my article. The 1918 narrative is one of the things used to put people in fear, while at the same time protecting the idea that vaccines are always beneficial. The article is over two years old, and I've already had run-ins with two "Truther" organisations who put out pieces that support the Spanish Influenza story; not through supporting it specifically, but by referring to 1918 without addressing the lie. I had had doubts about both of them being Controlled Opposition, and their refusal to accept the Fort Riley origin confirmed my suspicion.
As I said, please let me have your thoughts when you've read the article and attached references. I'm very open to debate, but sadly only know I've won them normally when the other side resorts to insults or "disappears." Truth loves debate, lies detest it.
With very best regards,
Keith
Hi Again John,
What are your thoughts on 1918 now?
Keith
What’s your email?
Drop me a line: jdvaroli@gmail.com
Very very interesting and I have questions. 👇🏻BINGO. 100%
“ Either way, the narrative here needs to go mainstream. 1918 was a mega pandemic; it is also a mega lie. And dismantling that first big lie is a good start to dismantling the framework of Covid lies that now permeates politics and media.”
OK. What are your questions?
Pls email me. Not here
This was really great and I learned a lot Sub'd!
Thanks you and You are most welcome.
I think that one possible motive for Fauci's (genocidal) fixation with mRNA vaccines is mentioned here in this article: that the influenza virus didn't kill, it only weakened the immune system. So to does HIV (another virus, btw, along with the common cold viruses and the herpes viruses that sicken people.)
Fauci's running a grand network of Pharma and Bio biz. A kingpin. There's a few other kingpins, no Emperor-pin yet.
But I think that Fauci saw in programmable mRNA, whether viral or by vaccine, the ability to ad-hoc debase immune systems worldwide, and then to sell sell sell more Pharma, more Bio.
In his 8 March 2020 60 Minute interview he was reinforceing his advice not to wears masks from his knowledge of the 1918 flu, the bacteriallly infected pleural fluids . Yes, in the paper from 2008 "Predominant Role of Bacterial Pneumonia as a Cause of Death in Pandemic Influenza: Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness" the authors, he being the last author listed of three (not so numerous!), masks are not mentioned. But in the interview the term he used was "schmutz". That's oral-nasal fluids, which can include pleural fluids, brought up from coughing and that term "pleural fluids" is used in the paper. It's remarkably strange advice at the time. Masks were indeed then a good protocol to follow.
Instead he emphasized hand washing.
If however Fauci THEN thought that secondary bacterial infections where killing the most sickened from the Covid virus, then the masks are meaningless, as they don't stop the internal bacteria already in people.
And he wanted the general weakening of immune systems, in everyone on Earth. So getting the virus is okay. It's pure marketing 101. Compel a market into buying your products.
great comment. thanks
Fauci's interview broadcast that night of 8 March 2020, was in that few weeks the cohort of international "artists" and entrepreneurs and bureaucrats was skull-duggerying with burner phones and cryptic emails and such on how to cover the tune coming out of the Peking Opera touring in Wuhan. That last week of February, first week of March, a high stress time for him and them. So his interview is interesting to me.
What about the other things going on, like vaccinations?
https://epidemiologyexplained.com/the-spanish-flu-was-neither-spanish-nor-flu-bombshell-or-atomic-bombshell/
I'm looking into that, as well as German biological warfare...
Hiya, I think the problem with the Spanish Flu, as with HiV and 'covid' is the virus itself https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/seeing-is-believing
🙏🏽
I get 503 (no service) when I try to access the encyclopedia you specified - censorship?
You mean the Influenza Encyclopedia? It should be operational. Try this link: http://www.influenzaarchive.org
I did - that was the reason for the comment. BUT,... I tried again today and it's online again - it may have been a routing black hole (sometimes happens with the routing protocols the Internet uses) or local server problem . Sorry to have troubled you.
Tremendous resource - I'm extremely grateful that you've provided the pointer to it.
I've also retained the link to your newsletter.
Confusing times need people with insight and a good memory.
Glad to help. I hope scholars will check their pride and admit their mistakes and set the record straight about the Spanish Flu.
It's also odd that no one ever seems to mention 1889 and previous instances - in consideration of that (for me) "covid" fails the "novel" criterion.
You mean the ‘Russian flu’ of 1889-90, yes? There have been a few articles about this. Even more interesting, in an article from the early 1990s, I found reference to the impact of solar radiation on instigating mutations and outbreaks. But I emphasize that the article only mentions this in passing and doesn’t offer much detail. I plan to follow this up
A flu of 1889-90 is what I mean. I've not dug deep enough to determine a geographic reference yet - just noted the date and the lack of a mention elsewhere.
I have a source which I can query for scientific articles and books back to 1800 - it's not perfect and the encyclopedia you pointed to fills a lot of gaps.
I'm still digging and I'm a novice at this - my background is in telecoms, hardware/software, computers and IT in many years past.